<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>DanNorris.com - Latest Comments in Future Oracle events</title><link>http://dannorris.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://dannorris.disqus.com/future_oracle_events/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:35:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Future Oracle events</title><link>http://www.dannorris.com/2008/04/24/future-oracle-events/#comment-8066868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the dates, I missed all but the two last ones, but it's useful anyway...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Birmingham guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:35:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Future Oracle events</title><link>http://www.dannorris.com/2008/04/24/future-oracle-events/#comment-1921108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For practical, use-it-now information, I think Collaborate has the best fit. For a lot about new features, what's coming, and lots of fun (Collaborate is fun too), OpenWorld is a great place to get that sort of stuff. For performance-focused sessions, the Hotsos Symposium is the place to be. If you can manage to convince your management, the UKOUG conference is a well-rounded, deeply technical event focused on Oracle technology. Occasionally, flights from Chicago to London are about the same cost as Chicago to San Francisco. Unfortunately, with the USD not doing so well, it isn't the best time to visit the  UK.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:07:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Future Oracle events</title><link>http://www.dannorris.com/2008/04/24/future-oracle-events/#comment-1921107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the dates. Collaborate '09 was on my list of 'to-find-out' the day I read this. Uncanny. here's hoping our conference and travel budgets make more sense. In your professional opinion, picking between the one's above, which one is the best bang for buck?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">piontekdd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:00:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>